I think this catalogue is something of a frightful mess (although I applaud the noble souls that labored to get it in its current state, regardless). Thanks, Mallocks, for doing the initial detabulation.
5 in C might be of use in the future I feel life's too short :-). I've removed all the red links on the grounds that links like Mazurka in C are no use. I removed the date of composition where it is the same as the date of the containing opus, but left them in where each piece's composition date was different (for example, Op. It wasn't really in my to do list, but I have access to vi, awk & sed.
See this discussion of list formats for discussion of composition lists in general this list is the one which sparked the debate. I've checked two Chopin works pages (, ) that use different numberings for the pieces in opus 41.Ĭould someone explain to me why these are numbered this way? Catfacem3n ( talk) 22:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC) List format Why do some of the pieces in this work have plural numberings?
0 kommentar(er)
